APL003 mussels


download pdf





Sources of organic detritus under mussel farms in the Ría de Ares-Betanzos

By Joeri Kaal and CSIC-PROINSA Mussel Lab Team

The Galician coastline is enormously productive of high-quality seafood due to the vast supply of nutrients, oxygen and plankton in this unique coastal upwelling system1. One of the characteristics of the Rías is the abundance of raft farms, “bateas”: floating wooden structures with 500 ropes hanging into the water column and on which mussels grow (suspended mussel farming). Galician mussel farms represent the highest mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) producing area in Europe (>250 Million kg per year)2. These farms are known to both boost biodiversity in the water column, providing refuge to fauna and anchoring for macroalgae, but also to cause alteration of benthic communities due to the massive production of “biodeposits” (mussel fall-out and faeces), sometimes resulting into anoxia at the seabed3,4. The Marine Research Institute (IIM) of the Spanish Research Council (CSIC) has been studying the ecology, chemistry and sustainability of these suspended bivalve systems for many years2,5. Now, an effort has been made to identify the potential of analytical pyrolysis techniques to provide information on biodeposit composition by means of analysis of particulate organic matter (POM) from sediment traps deployed underneath the farms.


Schematic representation of the analyzed system, showing the mussel cultures (rafts) and underlying sediment traps.



The samples were obtained from a mussel culture polygon in the vicinities of Lorbé in the Ría de Ares-Betanzos (Sada, A Coruña province, Galicia, NW Spain), consisting of 107 rafts and an annual production of 10,000 tons of mussels. The particulate organic matter (POM) samples were obtained from multitrap collectors that were deployed beneath raft #46 (further from coast, 16 m water depth) and raft #14 (closer to coast and fish cages, 14 m depth) (Figure 1) on the 2nd and 3rd of May, 2011 (Spring bloom oceanographic scenario5). Samplers were deployed at the bow (or proa, i.e. water entry) and stern (popa, water exit) sides of the rafts. The traps contained four collectors which were open for no more than 12 h to mitigate the influence of microbial decomposition in the traps. Two of the 4 collectors within each trap were analyzed, T1 and T2 (these correspond to adjacent PVC cylinders within the multitrap). No preservatives were used (for details, see Zúñiga et al. 2014 5). Hence, a total of 8 samples were considered (2 rafts x 2 positions x 2 replicates) as a first approach to determine biodeposit sources and identify mechanisms that control variability in POM’s molecular composition. After retrieving the suspensions from the traps their content was filtered through Whatman GF/F filters (0.7 μm pore size). Due to the low inorganic matter content of these samples (<10 %), no sample treatment other than drying at 100 ºC, was performed (it would be a different scenario for the samples from Winter, which may have inorganic contents exceeding 75 %)5.

The Py-GC-MS analyses were performed by inserting solid POM (that was scraped directly from the filters) into quartz tubes with quartz wool on both ends. Pyrolysis was performed for 10 s at 650 °C, with a Pyroprobe 5000. The pyrolyzer was connected to a 6890 GC and 5975 MSD from Agilent Technologies. For chromatographic temperature profiles and MSD parameters, see Kaal et al. 6. Major peaks were quantified on the basis of characteristic m/z fragments. Data evaluation was based on i) pyrolysis compound percentages, analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and linear correlation analysis.

Table 1 presents the list of samples analyzed and parameters that are used for comparison with the Py-GC-MS data: fluxes of nitrogen (Ntotal), carbon (Ctotal) and organic C (Corg), which is modified data after Zúñiga et al. (2014)5.


Table 1. List of samples analyzed and selected parameters

Raft Date Sampler Sample Ntotal Ctotal Corg
m/d/yr mg/m2d mg/m2d mg/m2d
#46 bow 5/2/2011 T1 17 405 2503 1603
5/2/2011 T2 18 304 1866 2092
#46 stern 5/2/2011 T1 19 813 5017 5101
5/2/2011 T2 20 619 4340 2833
#14 bow 5/3/2011 T1 27 186 1283 1045
5/3/2011 T2 28 210 1409 1321
#14 stern 5/3/2011 T1 29 447 3157 1958
5/3/2011 T2 30 488 3576 1930



A large array of carbohydrate- and especially protein-derived pyrolysis products were detected (pyrroles, pyridines, diketodipyrrole, indoles) (Table 2). They include markers of N-acetylglucosamine polymers (acetamidosugars), which can be found in chitin from arthropod/crustacean/mollusk exoskeleta (and squid beaks), bacterial cell wall material, and the mucus of mollusks that cover faeces and pseudofaeces (Figure 2). The majority, if not all, of the other carbohydrate and protein products probably originate from mussel derivatives or marine biota such as phytoplankton.


Table 2. List of pyrolysis products and source allocation (CARB=carbohydrate, LIG=lignin, MAH=monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, MCC=metylene chain compound, NCOMP=N-compound, PAH=polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, PHEN=phenol)

# RT (min) compound m/z group
1 1.075 MeBr 94+96 other
2 1.371 benzene 78 MAH
3 1.569 pyridine 79+52 NCOMP
4 1.601 pyrrole 67 NCOMP
5 1.704 toluene 91+92 MAH
6 1.78 acetamide 59 NCOMP
7 1.897 3/2-furaldehyde 95+96 CARB
8 2.037 C1-pyrrole 80+81 NCOMP
9 2.146 C1-pyridine 93+66 NCOMP
10 2.396 styrene 104+78 MAH
11 2.786 5-methyl-2-furaldehyde 110+109 CARB
12 2.942 benzonitrile 103+76 NCOMP
13 3.082 phenol 94+66 PHEN
14 3.701 C1-phenol 107+108 PHEN
15 3.888 C1-phenol 107+108 PHEN
16 4.075 carbohydrate compound 126 CARB
17 4.569 C2-phenol 107+122 PHEN
18 4.845 naphthalene 128 PAH
19 5.115 propylcyanobenzene 91+131 NCOMP
20 5.193 4-vinylphenol 91+120 LIG
21 5.266 C3-phenol 121+136 PHEN
22 5.739 indole 117+90 NCOMP
23 5.843 3-acetamido-5-methylfuran 97+(69+)139 NCOMP
24 5.858 C1-naphthalene 142+141(+115) PAH
25 5.864 p-tert-butylphenol 135+107(+150) cont
26 5.931 C3:1 phenol (isopropenyl?) 134+119 cont
27 5.994 C1-naphthalene 142+141(+115) PAH
28 6.139 3-acetamido-2/4-pyrone 111+(82+)153 NCOMP
29 6.55 C1-indole 130+131 NCOMP
30 6.566 biphenyl 154 PAH
31 8.214 fluorene 166+165 PAH
32 8.458 5-bromoindole 197+195(+116+89) NCOMP
33 8.521 levoglucosan 60+73 CARB
34 8.988 diketodipyrrole 186+93 NCOMP
35 9.623 phenanthrene/anthracene 178 PAH
36 9.68 C14-fatty acid 60+73 MCC
37 10.117 alkane/alkene pair 55+57 MCC
38 10.158 phenylnaphthalene 204+203 PAH
39 10.283 phytadiene 1 68+95(278) MCC
40 10.496 diketopiperazine 70+154+194 NCOMP
41 10.507 C16-alkylnitrile 97 NCOMP
42 10.579 phytadiene 2 81+82(278) MCC
43 11.006 C16-fatty acid 60+73 MCC
44 12.191 C16-alkylamide 59+72 NCOMP
45 12.243 p,p‘-isopropylidenebisphenol 213+228 cont
46 12.243 C18-fatty acid 60+73 MCC
47 14.229 unknown compound (91+)129+207 other
48 16.013 triterpenoid compound 368+353 other
49 16.663 triterpenoid compound 69+269(+298) other

 The most abundant group of products are the N-containing compounds, which account for 27.4 ± 3.1 % of TQPA (percentage of total quantified peak area), followed by monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (MAHs; 23.1 ± 3.7 %) and phenols (22.8 ± 5.1 %). This set of compounds is a clear indication that the POM originates from predominantly N-rich sources. The abundance of not only many protein markers (such as indoles from tryptophan or diketopiperazines from dimerization reactions of peptide chains during pyrolysis) but also products N-acetylglucosamine biopolymers suggests that mussel detritus, whether it be chitin from shells or mucus in faeces droppings, is a significant, if not dominant source of POM. Note that theoretically psuedofaeces (droppings of mucus-entangled inorganic matter filtered by the animal but which did not pass its digestive system) may also provide mucus to the biodeposits but due to the low seston concentration in the clear waters of NW Spain in general, production of pseudofaeces is unlikely (seston below threshold of 4 mg/L)5.


Fig. 2. Basic structure of N-acetylglucosamine polymers.

The proteins may originate from a combination of the mussel’s faeces, and alternative (marine) sources such as macroalgae and plankton. According to the high chlorphyll a content of these samples5, detritus from primary production is expected to be significant. The phenols may largely originate from aromatic amino acids in proteins such as tyrosine moieties, and the same can be argued for toluene among the MAH which is associated with phenylalanine7. Another component of the POM is of pyrogenic origin: products of e.g. charcoal from wildfires or soot from incomplete fuel combustion. This pyrogenic POM is reflected by PAHs (1.6 ± 0.4 % naphthalene, alkylnaphthalenes, fluorene, biphenyl, phenylnaphthalene, etc.), but also benzene (MAH) and benzonitrile5 (N-containing pyrogenic POM). This reaffirms previous indications5 of the presence of a minor fraction of allochthonous POM from runoff, with a high C/N ratio, and which is concentrated in the littoral areas in the studied ría 8. One sample produced a significant amount of a 5-methylbromoindole (sample 20, Table 1), whereas the pyrolyzates of the other samples contained trace amounts of this molecule. This may be a natural organobromine compound from marine biota9, or a secondary pyrolysis reaction between inorganic bromine and protein-derived indole, and has not been detected previously identified in POM pyrolyzates. Methyl-bromide (MeBr) is also abundant.

The long-chain aliphatic products (8.9 ± 1.9 %), or methylene chain compounds (MCC), also have various potential sources. Two phytadienes were detected among the MCC, which act as probably products of chlorophyll, from phytoplankton and/or macroalgae. The remaining products, notably fatty acids, may originate from any source but especially algae and mussel faeces were expected to be prolific of these compounds. Carbohydrate products account for 8.7 ± 2.3 %. They may be of any biological source mentioned above, but the high abundance of N-acetylglucosamine polysaccharide products among the N-compounds suggests that the carbohydrates may originate predominantly from chitin and/or mucus. Contamination indicators (4.9 ± 4.7 %) are tert-phenols and a bisphenol product. They probably both originate from bisphenol-type anthropogenic contamination. The C3:1-phenol compound shows similar differences in proportion among samples, and is therefore likely to originate from such contamination as well. Finally, lignin from terrestrial plants could not be unequivocally identified but the presence of a compound with m/z 120 and 91 at the expected retention time of 4-vinylphenol might reflect traces of land plant debris (if so, probably sedges or grasses including seagrasses).

For the ANOVA, we used all continuous variables as input attributes and the discrete parameters raft number (raft #46 vs. raft #14), trap position (bow vs. stern), and sampler (T1 vs. T2) as target variables.

As expected, none of the variables is affected by sampler number (T1/T2) located at the same spot (different cylinders in the same trap). For trap position, some significant (P<0.05) differences were observed. Firstly, the fluxes of Ctotal and Ntotal higher in the trap deployed at the stern position (popa). This suggests that the waters that flow through the rafts and the mussel cords gain in POM content along this path through the raft and illustrate biodeposition intensity differences. In other words, the effects of the rafts on the deposition of faeces can be observed not only from mass fluxes but also from relative contributions to POM. Among the Py-GC-MS products, stern samples are enriched in 3-acetamidopyrone (mussel chitin/mucus) and levoglucosan (chitin and perhaps other polysaccharides). Bow samples are enriched in MeBr. All the other >60 variables did not show significant differences.

For raft location, #14 was enriched in benzene, benzonitrile and fluorene (black-carbon derived) whereas #46 is enriched in some aliphatic products (an alkane/alkene pair and C16-alkylamide). This suggests that the site that is closer to the coastline is enriched in terrestrial black carbon materials, possibly indicative of fluxes of charcoal particles from rivers and streams that discharge in the area.

The linear correlations between the C and N  fluxes showed some interesting relationships. Strong positive correlations between Ctotal and 3-acetamidopyrone (r=0.92!, P<0.005), C1-indole, diketopiperazines, levoglucosan and C16-fatty acid probably show the effect of POM sedimentation rate and proportions of mucus (delivering the N-acetylglucosamine polymer) and phytoplanikton (delivering protein). Negative correlations between Ctotal and MeBr, styrene and bisphenol products probably represents a dilution effect (less biodeposits, more background signal). The same patterns are observed for Corg and Ntotal. The C/N ratio is not correlated to any pyrolysis product.



The molecular properties of the POM could be largely traced back to nitrogen-containing biopolymers, in particular protein and mucus/chitin. Mucus and chitin cannot be distinguished on the basis of the available data yet, as we have not analyzed references materials for mussel mucus. The chitin/mucus originates predominantly from the mussel particles that trickle down from the rafts into the traps, possibly representing fall-off (although unlikely) and, most importantly, faeces. The protein originates from mussel debris (mucus/chitin) and plankton, and the presence of phytadienes provide strong evidence for algae-derived aliphatic POM (chlorophyll). The relative proportions of mucus/chitin and phytoplanktonic protein and aliphatic POM cannot be addressed: pyrolytic reactions are complex and chitin is entangled in protein which is difficult to distinguish from non-entangled protein in phytoplankton. However, from the ANOVA it was concluded that mussel debris was more abundant in the exit (stern) than entry (bow) of the mussel farms, which may reflect the background signal of POM from sources that are not directly associated to the bivalve cultures such as plankton. Other materials that were identified were traces of bisphenol contamination of unknown origin and fire residues (charcoal, black carbon), the latter of which had a stronger signal in the pyrolysis chromatograms from raft that was closest to the coastline (#14). In this context, it is worthy to mention that the region is subjected to a very intense fire regime. There is a clear potential of molecular characterization of particulate debris underneath mussel rafts to understand organic matter cycling and seafloor ecology.



The efforts of Uxío Labarta, María-José Fernández-Reiriz, Diana Zúñiga and Carmen González Castro, among other members of the CSIC-PROINSA Mussel Farm Team, allowed for the materialization of this collaboration.



  1. Fraga, F., 1981. Upwelling off the Galician Coast, Northwest Spain. Book Series: Coastal and Estuarine Sciences, Volume 1: 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1029/CO001p0176.
  2. Labarta, U., Fernández-Reiriz, M.J., Pérez-Camacho, A., Pérez-Corbacho, E., 2004. El mejillón, un paradigma bioeconómico. In: Fundación Caixa Galicia (Ed.), Bateeiros, mar, mejillón. Una perspectiva bioeconómica: Centro de Investigación Económica y
    Financiera. Editorial Galaxia, Vigo, pp. 19–479
  3. Otero, X.L., Calvo de Anta, R.M., Macías, F., 2008. Iron geochemistry under mussel rafts in the Galician ria system (Galicia-NW Spain). Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 81, 83–93.
  4. Chamberlain, J., Fernandes, T.F., Read, P., Nickell. T.D., Davies, I.M., 2001. Impacts of biodeposits from suspended mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) culture on the surrounding surficial sediments. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 58: 411–416, doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.1037.
  5. Zúniga, D., Castro, C.G., Aguiar, E., Labarta, U., Figueiras, F.G., Fernández-Reiriz, M.J., 2014. Biodeposit contribution to natural sedimentation in a suspended Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk mussel farm in a Galician Ría (NW Iberian Peninsula). Aquaculture 432, 311–320.
  6. Kaal, J., Martínez Cortizas, A., Nierop, K.G.J., Buurman, P., 2008. A detailed pyrolysis-GC/MS analysis of a black carbon-rich acidic colluvial soil (Atlantic ranker) from NW Spain. Applied Geochemistry 23, 2395-2405.
  7. Tsuge, S., Matsubara, H., 1985. High-resolution pyrolysis-gac chromatography if proteins and related materials. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 8: 49-64.
  8. Sánchez-Mata, A., Glémarec, M., Mora, J., 1999. Physicochemical structure of the benthic environment of a Galician ría (Ría de Ares–Betanzos, north-west Spain). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 1–21.
  9. Andreotti, A., Bonaduce, I., Colombini, M.P., Ribechini, E., 2004. Characterisation of natural indigo and shellfish purple by mass spectrometric techniques. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 18: 1213–1220.